By TOM
YANCEY
Staff Writer
The Greene
County Commission voted unanimously Monday to rezone property owned by William and Mary Ann Wayland
from A-1 general agriculture zoning to B-2 general business uses.
The
rezoned Wayland property is located along Baileyton Road near Crumley Road. The Waylands want to
operate an auto-repair and storage facility, according to the report from the County Planning
staff.
Name Is Workhouse/Annex
The
commission also approved a resolution to officially name the county's workhouse. County Sheriff
Steve Burns told the budget committeee that, when the facility was built in 2002 it was not formally
named, though it has always been referred to as the Greene County
Workhouse.
Without discussion, the resolution was approved to make the
official name the Greene County Workhouse/Annex.
Proclamations
Two other proclamations were presented at
Monday's meeting, one honoring Baileyton United Methodist Church and encouraging citizens to join in
the effort to rebuild the church building, which was destroyed by fire in November
2007.
Another recognized the work of the Appalachian Regional Coalition
of Homeless Shelters.
Civil War Signs
Dr. Robert Orr, who teaches history at Walters State Community College, spoke to
the commission, saying he had been asked by the Civil War Trails Commission to ask the county
commission to consider posting signs at some notable local sites.
"If we
don't do it, it won't be done," Orr told the commission. Orr, who is a specialist in the Civil War
period, especially Andrew Johnson, said that East Tennessee's importance has not been well
recognized among scholars or the public in the past, "but it's
coming."
Orr said he has been able, through oral history and research, to
identify some of the sites where Civil War "bridge burners" were hanged, as well as a Confederate
cemetery that until recently he did not know about.
"Signs will help the
tourism industry," Orr said.
School Issues
Jack West, who is chairman of the Greene County Democratic Party, spoke about
schools, though he noted that he was speaking as only a citizen and
father.
West said his daughter is a student at Glenwood Elementary
School, where "some of the restrooms don't have hot water," he said, and a son who is a freshman at
West Greene High School. "I need not go into the mess down there," he
said.
West said he is not aware of any cost studies about additional
expenses the county might incur related to possible replacement of the Greene County Detention
Center as a way to maintain state certification.
West said all
discussions about a new detention center have been based on the availability of large numbers of
state and federal inmates, but if that availability later changes, the county's citizens could be
forced, through a property tax hike, "to pay for a white elephant
building."
West said the decision to "spend money for jails, not schools
... sends a message to the educational system" that it is not
important.
He said citizens should be able to vote on whether the next
priority of the county is a jail or a school, and urged the commission to consider the county's
children an asset.
West said he is collecting signatures on a resolution
to that effect.
It was noted that some members of the commission who are
also county employees read a statement declaring that they had a conflict of interest on the matter
about to be voted on, but some commission members did not.
Electronic
Voting
For only the second time, the commission was using a new
electronic voting system, with votes displayed on a projection
screen.
Asked if lack of the statement could cause votes not to be valid,
County Attorney Roger Woolsey said the votes were valid, and cited the section 12-4-101 (c) of state
law.
This section reads: "(c) (1) Any member of a local governing body
of a county or a municipality who is also an employee of such county or municipality and whose
employment predates the member's initial election or appointment to the governing body of the county
or municipality may vote on matters in which the member has a conflict of interest if the member
informs the governing body immediately prior to the vote as
follows:
"'Because I am an employee of (name of governmental unit), I
have a conflict of interest in the proposal about to be voted. However, I declare that my argument
and my vote answer only to my conscience and to my obligation to my constituents and the citizens
this body represents.' The vote of any such member having a conflict of interest who does not so
inform the governing body of such conflict shall be void if challenged in a timely manner. As used
in this subdivision (c)(1), "timely manner" means during the same meeting at which the vote was cast
and prior to the transaction of any further business by the body."